Tales Of A Gamer
HERO OF HEART
{ wear }
Straight up randomness. And art stuffs. But mostly randomness. I have to warn any potential readers: I have one hell of a butt fetish, so if man-butts aren't your thing, you're at the wrong blog.
ginmushroom:

beautiful art from teh stream hello i am having fun here //DIES

This piece speaks to me on both an emotional and a spiritual level. It is both provacative and demure; joyful with just the barest hint of bittersweet melancholy. 
I’ll buy it!

ginmushroom:

beautiful art from teh stream hello i am having fun here //DIES

This piece speaks to me on both an emotional and a spiritual level. It is both provacative and demure; joyful with just the barest hint of bittersweet melancholy.

I’ll buy it!

shirohomura:

redeh:

When you want to be friends with someone but you’re too shy to ask for their Skype

image

When you have people on skype but are to shy to talk to themimage

lokidindeed:

i-deduce-youre-a-bitch:

YOU NIQQAS WANNA LEARN ELVISH?! HERE YA GO!

this makes me think about the post about the two girls who didn’t want to get caught sendes notes in class so they learned elvish

6 hours ago
22/22/2013

kirihamasaki:

Nijimura senpai and 2 gou (˘˘)

 

15 hours ago
22/22/2013

kteurn:

vajigglejaggle:

whats-that-jacket-margiela:

goodbyejules:

anythingloveable:

coalwood:

Best Vines of May 2013 (Part 1)

oh my fuck

😂😂😂

😭😭😭

😂😂😂😂

Ohh my god 😂😂😂

I FUCKING LOST IT AT 2:37

(Source: nsfwhumor)

"In the 101 top-grossing family films…from 1990 to 2004, of the over 4,000 characters in these films, 75% overall were male, 83% of characters in crowds were male, 83% of narrators were male, and 72% of speaking were male. When the American Psychological Association commented on this research, they said, ‘This gross under-representation of women or girls in films with family-friendly content reflects a missed opportunity to present a broad spectrum of girls and women in roles that are non-sexualised.’"

Natasha Walter, Living Dolls: The Return of Sexism, pages 69-70, 2010. (via bitemebeautiful)

Bringing this back as people have started reblogging this again and EVERYONE SHOULD KNOW THIS.

(via bitemebeautiful)

1 day ago
22/22/2013
krudman:

thethirdelric:

krudman:

Remember when consoles were about playing games and not advertising or updating twitter?

remember when video games were desperately underfunded and glitchy, when they were so bad that the video game industry as a whole almost went down the shitter until one company (nintendo) started making games, that weren’t so popular for being good games (back then, they’re more popular and seen as “amazing games” now because of nostalgia) but were popular and actually revived the entire video game industry because they had games that TURNED ON AND WORKED. and now that the video game industry is spending millions of dollars to makes games so great (see max paine 3, $108 mil to produce) and the only way they can get the funding for these games that you know and love is by SELLING THEM, and you SELL them by advertising, because people don’t make money off things that don’t sell, and people don’t buy things unless they have that thing shoved violently down their throat plenty of times.
tldr you have good games because of the shitty advertising deal with it

You seem to think you know quite a bit. If your tumblr profile is to be believed, you don’t really remember nearly as much as I do from your well seasoned age of 17.  This is to say when you were 7, you were playing the Playstation 2 at it’s elder years.
Games prior to this were not grossly under budgeted. They were simply budgeted. Now games are grossly over budgeted because corporations have decided we the consumer want soulless, “edgy” brown sequels much like the much critically mixed Max Payne 3 that Rockstar spent way to much money making for a game that was not nearly as compelling as the previous entries in the series. Compared to gears of war, and I will hold my opinion as to the quality of those games, but the budget for those is closer to 15-20 million.
Does “shitty advertising” pay for that? No. Publishers do. But Microsoft has found ways to make sure the console you paid for that belongs to you belongs to them as much as they can. That’s why they update it so often. That’s why you’re bombarded with ads on your dashboard. I’m not exposed to coca-cola or dorito ads when I’m playing Mass Effect. That’s all from turning on my xbox and seeing that advertisers now have a stake in the system I paid for. It would be foolish for anyone to think that any of this money goes into game development.
As per your comment on quality of games only going up, the bigger games get, the amount of bugs only goes up. The more stable games in this day and age do not come from AAA game developers (Elder Scrolls is a prime example). They come from indie developers that microsoft has shunned once again. You have patches today that you did not need over ten years ago because publishers feel that they can shipped unfinished buggy games and fix them later. Why? Because they want their money.
When you turn on a game system, and it’s one gigantic hub for everything with games seemingly as an afterthought, at what point does this benefit games? When that much greed comes into a practice of making art for profit, at what point does it improve what was already good? 

krudman:

thethirdelric:

krudman:

Remember when consoles were about playing games and not advertising or updating twitter?

remember when video games were desperately underfunded and glitchy, when they were so bad that the video game industry as a whole almost went down the shitter until one company (nintendo) started making games, that weren’t so popular for being good games (back then, they’re more popular and seen as “amazing games” now because of nostalgia) but were popular and actually revived the entire video game industry because they had games that TURNED ON AND WORKED. and now that the video game industry is spending millions of dollars to makes games so great (see max paine 3, $108 mil to produce) and the only way they can get the funding for these games that you know and love is by SELLING THEM, and you SELL them by advertising, because people don’t make money off things that don’t sell, and people don’t buy things unless they have that thing shoved violently down their throat plenty of times.

tldr you have good games because of the shitty advertising deal with it

You seem to think you know quite a bit. If your tumblr profile is to be believed, you don’t really remember nearly as much as I do from your well seasoned age of 17.  This is to say when you were 7, you were playing the Playstation 2 at it’s elder years.

Games prior to this were not grossly under budgeted. They were simply budgeted. Now games are grossly over budgeted because corporations have decided we the consumer want soulless, “edgy” brown sequels much like the much critically mixed Max Payne 3 that Rockstar spent way to much money making for a game that was not nearly as compelling as the previous entries in the series. Compared to gears of war, and I will hold my opinion as to the quality of those games, but the budget for those is closer to 15-20 million.

Does “shitty advertising” pay for that? No. Publishers do. But Microsoft has found ways to make sure the console you paid for that belongs to you belongs to them as much as they can. That’s why they update it so often. That’s why you’re bombarded with ads on your dashboard. I’m not exposed to coca-cola or dorito ads when I’m playing Mass Effect. That’s all from turning on my xbox and seeing that advertisers now have a stake in the system I paid for. It would be foolish for anyone to think that any of this money goes into game development.

As per your comment on quality of games only going up, the bigger games get, the amount of bugs only goes up. The more stable games in this day and age do not come from AAA game developers (Elder Scrolls is a prime example). They come from indie developers that microsoft has shunned once again. You have patches today that you did not need over ten years ago because publishers feel that they can shipped unfinished buggy games and fix them later. Why? Because they want their money.

When you turn on a game system, and it’s one gigantic hub for everything with games seemingly as an afterthought, at what point does this benefit games? When that much greed comes into a practice of making art for profit, at what point does it improve what was already good? 

1 day ago
21/21/2013

fuckwhyischoosingaurlsohard:

do you ever come up with a story in your head and you’re like ‘OMG THIS IS THE MOST AMAZING THING IN THE HISTORY OF EVER I THINK I’LL WRITE THIS’

but then you don’t know how to write and its just

image

(Source: the-femslash-fairy)

1 day ago
21/21/2013

archangel-bonding:

Yesterday was Tuesday, right? But today is Tuesday too!

The fact we STILL reblog these posts every Tuesday five seasons later should be convincing enough to bring Gabriel back already

fireflufferz:

Listen to your mother.

2 days ago
20/20/2013

ohcorny:

weepinduo

2 days ago
20/20/2013

twerkingcat:

fourlesbianssuited:

thecatcherandthepie:

les-sucettes-a-lanis:

Behold. South Park changing the derogatory definition of ‘fag.’ Making it synonymous with moron, jackass and douchebag.

Once the old homophobic preachers die out and a generations passes, we’ll be left with this lovely urban definition:

“Fag, noun. Used to describe someone acting with poor, rude and unintelligent behaviour.” 

South Park is perfect

You know there is a problem when South Park does a better job in realizing the mutability of language than most adults.

(Source: membersonlyguy)

shitstraightwhiteguyssay:

Excuse the sloppiness. I feel like people are more inclined to read things when they’re a picture, so I made this to give a really BRIEF and SHALLOW explanation of why “reverse sexism” is a bullshit way of describing what’s actually happening: patriarchy backfiring against men. There is a lot more to it than just this, though.
Source for women in advertising: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jan/20/ipa-women-in-advertising
Edit: sorry it’s so small, click for big version

shitstraightwhiteguyssay:

Excuse the sloppiness. I feel like people are more inclined to read things when they’re a picture, so I made this to give a really BRIEF and SHALLOW explanation of why “reverse sexism” is a bullshit way of describing what’s actually happening: patriarchy backfiring against men. There is a lot more to it than just this, though.

Source for women in advertising: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jan/20/ipa-women-in-advertising


Edit: sorry it’s so small, click for big version

3 days ago
19/19/2013

(Source: odysseiarex)

3 days ago
19/19/2013
excolo:

THIS SHIRT IS AWESOME
(n.b. probably only theme makers will get this)

excolo:

THIS SHIRT IS AWESOME

(n.b. probably only theme makers will get this)